testing QA Software Testing Continuous Testing Quality Assurance

9 min read

Performance Testing vs Chaos Engineering: What’s Actually Better in 2025?

Both claim to improve resilience—only one fits your system. Find out when to use chaos engineering vs performance testing and why it matters now.

author-image

Sara Codarlupo

Marketing Specialist @Gigantics

Performance testing is evolving fast. In 2025, it's not just about measuring system load—it's about ensuring that modern applications can scale, recover, and stay fast under real-world pressure. From chaos engineering to CI/CD integration, QA teams now face new demands when testing systems built on microservices, Kubernetes, and serverless infrastructures




What Is Performance Testing ?



Performance testing is the process of evaluating an application’s speed, stability, scalability, and reliability under different load conditions. Its goal is not only to identify bottlenecks but also to anticipate failures that may arise with increased traffic or higher data processing demands.



In modern environments, where systems are composed of hundreds of microservices deployed in Kubernetes or serverless architectures, performance testing can no longer rely on traditional approaches. It is now essential to incorporate testing at every stage of development and implement strategies such as controlled production testing (canary releases) or Chaos Engineering to ensure system resilience.



This is where the concept of continuous testing becomes crucial: integrating performance tests continuously at every stage of the development cycle allows teams to detect performance degradations before they impact production. Instead of conducting tests only at the final stages, Continuous Testing ensures ongoing evaluation of software stability in CI/CD environments.




What is chaos engineering?



Chaos engineering is the discipline of deliberately injecting faults into a system to uncover weaknesses before they impact users. Unlike traditional performance testing—which observes how a system handles known loads—chaos engineering introduces unpredictable conditions to test a system’s resilience.


The core goal is to build confidence in how systems behave under unexpected failures, such as:


  • Service outages

  • Latency spikes

  • Network partitions

  • Instance crashes


By simulating these disruptions in controlled environments, teams can validate recovery mechanisms, detect hidden dependencies, and improve incident response strategies.


Chaos engineering is especially valuable in distributed systems like Kubernetes or microservices architectures, where complexity makes it harder to predict failure paths.




Chaos Engineering vs Performance Testing: What’s the Difference?



Both chaos engineering and performance testing aim to improve software resilience, but they take different approaches:


MethodPurposeWhen to UseKey Value
Performance TestingMeasure system performance under loadDuring development and pre-production phasesIdentifies bottlenecks, latency, throughput, and error rates
Chaos EngineeringSimulate failures and observe resilienceDuring production rollouts or canary testingValidates fault tolerance and recovery in real-world scenarios

Chaos engineering is ideal for testing fault tolerance in distributed systems (e.g., Kubernetes), whereas performance testing benchmarks how the system responds to expected or extreme load.




Essential types of performance testing for DevOps and QA



Performance testing is categorized based on objectives and the environments where it is executed:



Load testing


Evaluates the application’s behavior under an expected load of concurrent users. Metrics like response time, performance, and error rate are analyzed, being crucial for database management in applications with large volumes of sensitive data.



Stress testing


Pushes a system beyond its expected capacity to analyze failure points. It helps identify memory leaks, CPU bottlenecks, and stability under extreme conditions.



Soak testing


Also known as endurance testing, this evaluates system behavior over extended periods to detect memory leaks, slowdowns, or degraded performance over time.



Spike testing


Examines how a system reacts to sudden, unexpected surges in traffic. This is crucial for applications with unpredictable usage patterns, such as e-commerce platforms during flash sales.



Chaos testing


Part of Chaos Engineering, this method deliberately introduces failures to observe system resilience. By shutting down containers, simulating latency spikes, or disrupting network connections, teams can build fault-tolerant architectures.



3. Top performance testing tools in 2025



K6 – Ideal for DevOps and CI/CD



K6 is a modern load testing tool based on JavaScript, designed for easy integration with CI/CD workflows. It enables teams to execute real-time load tests and track performance metrics efficiently.
Advantages:


  • Integration with monitoring tools like Grafana.

  • Compatible with serverless environments.

  • Ideal for evaluating database management in distributed applications.



Performance Testing for Microservices with JMeter



JMeter is one of the most popular open-source tools for assessing the performance of web applications, APIs, and databases. It’s widely used in microservices and Kubernetes environments to measure response times, server load, and the behavior of databases under heavy traffic conditions.



Advantages:


  • A robust tool for regression testing.

  • Supports multiple protocols like HTTP, FTP, JDBC, and more.

  • Ideal for data masking in test environments.



Locust – Python-Based testing



Locust is a flexible tool based on Python that allows developers to define user behavior in their applications. It can be used for load testing and evaluating behavior under concurrent traffic.


Advantages:


  • Horizontal scalability, which enables large-scale stress testing.

  • Easy integration with other monitoring and CI/CD systems.



Artillery – API performance testing



Artillery is perfect for performance testing in microservice and API applications. It provides real-time reporting and allows for high-load testing without compromising system performance.


Advantages:


  • Supports Data Governance in distributed testing.

  • Can be run in both on-premises and cloud environments.



Gremlin – Chaos engineering for Kubernetes and Cloud



  • For teams implementing Chaos Engineering, Gremlin is an advanced tool for performing chaos testing. It allows simulated attacks and controlled failures in distributed systems like Kubernetes, helping to verify how applications behave in unexpected situations.
    Advantages:

  • Ideal for testing in Kubernetes.

  • Simple integration with monitoring platforms and CI/CD workflows.



4. Key performance testing metrics: What really matters?



Performance metrics are essential for identifying bottlenecks and ensuring that applications perform optimally under various conditions. For performance testing, especially in database management applications and QA software testers, measuring the correct metrics is vital for system resilience and user experience. Below, we dive into the most important metrics for performance testing.



Response Time (P95, P99 Latency)



What it measures: Response time is the time it takes for the system to process a user request. It is measured from the moment the request is made to the moment the response is received.



Why it’s important: A low response time is essential to provide a smooth user experience. The P95 and P99 latency metrics are particularly useful as they measure response times for 95% and 99% of requests, respectively. This helps identify concurrency issues and database management challenges in applications with large volumes of sensitive data.



Technical considerations: Response time is influenced by various factors such as database security, network infrastructure, and the use of microservices. Tools like Prometheus and Grafana are recommended for real-time latency monitoring, especially in serverless and distributed environments.



Throughput (Performance)



What it measures: Throughput measures the number of requests the system can process per second.



Why it’s important: High throughput is crucial for applications that handle large amounts of data or require fast transactions, such as data governance and security applications or data masking services. Optimal performance ensures that the infrastructure can support the volume of concurrent users without issues.



Technical considerations: This value is closely related to database management capacity and underlying infrastructure, so it’s essential to measure it using monitoring tools like JMeter or K6, which can evaluate performance both in local and cloud environments.



Error Rate



What it measures: Error rate measures the percentage of requests that fail due to server errors, timeouts, or network issues.



Why it’s important: A high error rate indicates that the system cannot handle the load properly, which can severely affect the stability and reliability of database management. This is a sign that there may be issues with the infrastructure or the data being processed.



Technical considerations: It’s recommended to monitor the error rate using performance testing tools like JMeter and Locust, which can help identify failure points and the system's ability to handle regression testing under heavy loads.



CPU and Memory Usage



What it measures: CPU and memory usage measure the percentage of system resources used during performance testing.



Why it’s important: If CPU or memory usage reaches its limits, the application will begin to slow down or even fail. Measuring these resources is crucial for applications handling large volumes of sensitive data or those based on distributed microservices, where resource efficiency is vital.



Technical considerations: In Kubernetes and serverless environments, resource usage must be continuously monitored to ensure the system can scale correctly. Tools like AWS CloudWatch or Datadog provide visibility into CPU and memory usage, helping to make informed decisions about scalability and optimization.



Concurrency Limits



What it measures: Concurrency limits measure the maximum number of concurrent users or requests the system can handle without degrading its performance.



Why it’s important: Applications that experience traffic spikes, such as e-commerce sites or QA software testing platforms, must be able to handle large numbers of users without compromising performance. These limits indicate how many concurrent users can interact with the application without the system becoming unstable.



Technical considerations: Concurrency is closely tied to the number of microservices running simultaneously and database management. It’s recommended to perform load testing using tools like Locust or Artillery, which allow simulating multiple concurrent users to verify the system’s limits.



Transactions Per Second (TPS)



What it measures: Transactions per second measures how many transactions the system can process in one second.



Why it’s important: This metric is crucial for applications that rely on fast transaction execution, such as financial or Data Governance applications. Low TPS could indicate bottlenecks in the system, affecting the application’s ability to handle large amounts of data.



Technical considerations: Tools like JMeter and K6 are excellent for measuring TPS in regression testing environments or chaos testing, helping to identify the root cause of bottlenecks.



5. Integrating performance testing into CI/CD pipelines



Load testing on each pull request



Automating performance tests at the PR level ensures that performance degradations are detected before merging into production.



Real-Time alerts with grafana and prometheus



By integrating performance monitoring dashboards, teams can track system health, identify anomalies, and set up alerting mechanisms.



Chaos testing for resilience



Introducing controlled failures through Chaos Engineering improves the ability of applications to withstand disruptions.



Canary releases for safer deployments



Gradually rolling out new features to a subset of users helps in monitoring performance impacts before full-scale deployment.



In today’s highly distributed cloud-native environments, performance testing is a critical component of any development workflow. By adopting modern testing strategies, leveraging automation, and continuously monitoring system health, organizations can ensure their applications remain scalable, resilient, and performant.



With the increasing complexity of software ecosystems, performance testing is not just about preventing failures—it's about delivering an exceptional user experience under any condition.



Further Reading



If you're exploring modern QA strategies, here are some additional resources you may find useful: